Showing posts with label metaphysical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label metaphysical. Show all posts

Monday, January 27, 2014

As Natural as Breathing

AS NATURAL AS BREATHING

Many people who believe in the “spiritual but not religious” path—myself included—are often considered “anti-religion”.   This is the furthest thing from the truth. I am forever thankful for the incredible work that Christian organizations do to ease human suffering. Each day, millions of people around the world are fed, clothed and taught by Christian churches, schools, and hospitals.  For centuries, Christians have made a positive difference, from healers like Mother Theresa and Padre Pio, to the individual who anonymously donates money to a poor family in their congregation. Furthermore, I still believe in church as a sacred place and would never do or say anything to belittle it. 
That said, it is also my belief that the “faith-built” churches of today are not a continuation of the original church begun by Christ.  Instead, over the past two millennia, man has created the Church in his image, rather than in God’s.  The result is that there are some 39,000 separate and different expressions of Christianity around the earth that claim to hold the Truth.  
In a rather straightforward manner, I state in Chapter 7 of The Two Agreements, “As evidenced by the history of all religions, mankind seems to compulsively work to complicate the spiritual life of living in harmony with God, a relating that is as natural as breathing.”  Indeed, the connecting to God has become so circuitous and convoluted as to be a life’s pursuit, instead of the place from which we live our lives. I am reminded of the story of the two cats.  One is turning in circles chasing its tail. The second cat asks him why he is doing such a thing. “I was told that happiness abides in the tip of one’s tail. And I desperately want happiness.” To which the second cat replies, “I have learned that as I peacefully go on my way that happiness is with me and follows me wherever I go.” And, certainly, we need not seek something we already possess.
Indeed, upon examining church history, we find that the original church was not a formal institution, but small groups of people meeting in each other’s homes to spread Christ’s messages. The purpose of these meetings was twofold:  first, to bring salvation to those who had been born under the first covenant with God and, secondly, to spread the story of Christ’s life and resurrection.   The Church of today, however, is something altogether different. Sadly, it has become a tool to measure our “worthiness”, even one’s worthiness to hold public office and serve society.
Please note, Christ did not give a list of rules and regulations for doing church the “right way” in order to prove that we believe deeply enough or in the right way. He simply told us to accept the Holy Spirit. Ironically, the man who was persecuted for saying, “I and my Father are the same” is now believed to have been the only one so connected to Source, when in fact we all are. Now we are the blasphemers if we make this claim. Too often, instead of being encouraged to live our lives with God, we are encouraged to give our lives over to institutions that run similarly to the government and any other bureaucracy.  These institutions are largely based on the premise that we are separate, not only from God, but from each other. Ultimately, that premise leads us into feelings of fear, guilt and shame, which make manipulation possible.
As evidenced by the thousands fleeing the Church each year, that premise is no longer working. I believe these folk are being called to be mystics—to directly plug into the Source instead of going through the “middle man” that the Church has become.  

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Today, we need to have the Conversation more than ever.

group 

I invite you to support a controversial conversation: the Emergent Conversation. Some religious leaders wish it to end; others believe it already has ended. I propose that the need for the Emergent Conversation has never been greater. People (especially the younger generations) are disillusioned with traditional Christianity; they hunger for God, yet they are “turned off” by the dogma, the rules, and the narrow version of salvation. By way of example, I recently heard a story about a young Christian woman who had lost her father to cancer. As his condition deteriorated, she became increasingly concerned about “where he was going to go” after he died. Her father had spoken of God, but he had not been a churchgoer, and she was not quite sure whether he believed the “right” things. As she put it, “being a good person is not enough to get you into Heaven.”

These beliefs only serve to cut us off from God, each other, and our spiritual selves. That’s why a central message of my reinterpretation is that there is no separation between man and God, except that which lives in our hearts and minds. This separation, which began with Adam and Eve (the “Lie”) has been perpetrated throughout history by the Christian establishment. It preaches that we are all inherently sinful. Any “sin” we commit (i.e. not following religious dogma) further separates us from God and excludes us from the kingdom of Heaven. Any questioning of this dogma is a sin in and of itself, for it indicates a “disbelief” in Jesus, God, and the Bible.

The Conversation, however, welcomes questions, for it is in this way that we come to God in love, not for fear that we will be banished to hell. There are several things not explained by the traditional interpretation of the Scriptures, that have left many of us feeling marginalized and unworthy for not believing strongly enough. For example:

· How is it Jesus did a perfect work and paid for all sins, yet humankind is still in danger of losing soul salvation, and therefore must continually ask forgiveness for these same sins?

· How is it that God expects us to sincerely love Him with all our heart while under the threat of eternal punishment if we fail to truly, sincerely love Him?

· Why does the phrase “plan of salvation” appear on gospel tracts, but cannot be found in the gospels of the New Testament?

· How is it that the church of today is not, neither can it ever become, a continuation of the church Jesus commissioned?

· Given that Christ's resurrected life brought victory and salvation, why is the cross, an instrument of death, the celebrated symbol of Christianity?

· How many times have we sat in church wondering why being with God must be so mechanical and boring?

· Jesus taught that all people are one with the Father, so why does the church teach that people are separate and removed from God?

The questions are only the beginning, but my answers to them go a long way to eliminating fear and bringing us closer to God. The aim of the Conversation is to rethink all aspects of Christianity. And I support the undertaking by writing the reinterpretation of the Good News story. This reinterpretation debunks the Lie of our separation from God and teaches us a simple yet often-buried Truth: that we are nothing more (and nothing less!) than aspects of the Creator.

Ironically, one of the most encouraging reactions to the Conversation has come from the Christian establishment; not in the form of acceptance, of course, but rather an attempt to repackage their own mainstream message. The current trend in Christian churches is the kinder, gentler version: more love, less judgment. Yet the basic message remains the same: believe as we do, or you will be forever separated from God and his Kingdom. This makes the Emergent Conversation, or Movement, even more necessary, if only to keep applying pressure.

On the other hand, there are many challenges to the Emergent Movement, not only from those outside it, but also from within. As with any “shiny new toy”, there is the threat of eventual disillusionment. For those seeking instant gratification, there is the very real chance of returning to conformist views or having no spiritual life at all. Therefore, my advice to those joining the Movement is to keep in mind that this is not a “quick fix”, but a long-term commitment to know God and oneself.

It is my sincere desire that it continues and remains a powerful influence on Christianity as the global community undergoes The Great Emergence. That’s why I have pledged to make myself available to congregations wanting to learn to create inspirational support networks and groups for them. For more information on my group work with a plurality of faiths, please visit: The Two Agreements FB page, thetwoagreements.blogspot.com, thetwoagreements.wordpress.com. Contact us: thetwoagreements@yahoo.com

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Welcome to the blog

 pic by cpcache
I am excited to welcome you to my blog.  These days I work to complete my book on a reinterpretation of the good news story.  It is a post modern interpretation that brings the most powerful story in the history of mankind into the current time.  The first time I came across the optical illusion of the name Jesus it took me a moment to get the picture.  But after I saw the word I was unable to not see it. So it is with the reinterpretation that I bring to those truth seekers among us.  The reinterpretation will bring a view of the Bible theme to the forefront.  That view was there all the time, however, it takes more than looking at the surface to see what the story is communicating. 

The work is going quickly on my book.  At the moment, I expect to complete the writing and editing phase by the end of March.  Until that time I plan to blog my progress and share the exciting spiritual perspective that I gain by living from the reinterpretation.  Again, welcome.